Benefits of Affirmative Action
In the past, there was a lot of discrimination in the American place of work where minorities and women were all kept out of any well-paying and prestigious jobs. They were forced to work menial jobs or stay home even though they had qualified for the prestigious jobs. Great steps have been taken to integrate businesses to make certain that each person has equal advantages and job opportunities.
Affirmative action refers to the US policy that promotes diversity in the place of work. This is also a way of making amends for preventing minorities and women from taking any jobs that they had qualified for. These laws clearly show the American principles of diversity and equality in the service of justice. The following are some of the many benefits of affirmative action.
1. Provides a diverse workforce
Affirmative action enables the hiring of people from different races and cultures. The result is a group of workers with a wide range of talents and abilities. This means that there is going to be a variety of solutions to problems and this will lead to more gains for the company.
2. Better products
The more diverse workforce enables the business to provide a greater range of goods and services that appeal to a much larger audience. This is because the company can get some new ideas from the new workers and that will lead to the creation of much better products that other people can easily identify with.
3. New clients
The diverse employees enable the company to carry out its business with equally varied clients. This helps the company to expand and grow due to the new clients.
The only disadvantage associated with affirmative action is the fact that some employers consider it to be unfair since it forces them to hire particular employees and if they refuse to do so, they will be breaking the law.
This description omits veterans and the disabled who are also covered by affirmative action requirements. It is so much easier to stir up resentment of affirmative action if the only focus is on its coverage of minorities. This paper is too narrowly argued. And in that way, discriminatory.